May 19, 2011

Apr 13, 2011

Enterprise Network Firewalls Leak

NSS Labs released yet another hard-hitting test report, not on the latest security innovations, but rather on decades old technology: network firewalls. They've been around long enough to take for granted and are starting to be replaced by next generation firewalls.

In our testing, five out of six, or 83%, of the enterprise network firewalls we tested in January leaked traffic using the default settings that the vendor ships to customers, letting external attackers become trusted insiders. Yes, let that sink in for a minute as there is no way to understate the importance of this. Several currently deployed enterprise firewalls are leaking traffic. And half are also failing stability testing, which jeopardizes integrity and continuity of operations. Everything is well documented in our Enterprise Network Firewall Group Test Report (client access required), FAQ, and Remediation Brief (free to registered users). Tested firewalls include: Check Point, Cisco, Fortinet, Juniper, Palo Alto Networks, Sonicwall.

This is not some new vulnerability. Rather, it's a well-known problem for which papers have been written, and attack code is available on the net. The bad guys have the info already. But apparently most of the vendors, and probably nearly all their customers who rely on firewall protection either don't know or have prioritized performance over security. Recognizing the widespread importance of the issue, we notified vendors immediately in January and February, and at considerable expense to us, worked with them for two months to explain the issues and solicit workarounds and fixes. Half the vendors could have protected customers, but did not, having shipped their firewalls with the protection off by default— leaving enterprise networks vulnerable out of the box. There are reasons, but no good ones in our opinion. An analogy is that of a car having the airbag disabled by default (but no warning). This is Job #1 for a firewall.

Bottom line: Your network firewall may not be protecting you, despite having multiple certifications from test labs. In fairness, these types of certifications were designed as minimum bars vendors must pass in order for the US government to purchase them, and not comprehensive assurance. Why? Because they don't test all the things we at NSS Labs do with the same rigor or as they're actually deployed at customer sites (like hackers do).


To be clear, claims that IPS or AV can stop a TCP split handshake attack are not accurate. Those are workarounds for trying to find malicious activity after the intruder has already gained access inside the firewall. It's like saying a metal detector will catch somebody who stole an employee ID card to get in the building. Only if they're carrying a gun or knife, but they could still roam freely and steal critical information if they stay under the radar.


Now, the only way for an enterprise to know it's firewall is blocking the attack is to check the configuration and/or test it against the specific attack. Given the market deployments of firewalls, millions of deployed firewalls need to be checked for this flaw in the field. As a public service, we've made a FAQ and remediation steps for the affected products that have TCP workarounds available on our site at no cost. We encourage anyone with a firewall to test their firewalls immediately for the issues described in detail in our full network firewall group test report. Also covered in the report: security effectiveness; evasion, performance, pricing and TCO test results. We utilized the BreakingPointSystems equipment for the testing, and special thanks to Tod Beardsley for the research (see paper).

Testing is not exactly straight forward, and many people are trying to come to terms with it, so if you have questions or need help, contact one of our security analysts. Given the number of firewalls out there, we all have a lot of work to do.

Mar 16, 2011

What's your next browser?

Web browsers have become the new killer app - serving as the platform for accessing our favorite personal and business applications in the cloud. As we've discussed previously on this blog and in our research, web browsers, and more often their plug-ins, represent significant vulnerability risks to individuals and organizations. This week we find ourselves in a unique point in time, when several major browser upgrades have been released (or are imminently upon us): Chrome 10, Firefox 4, Internet Explorer 9, Opera 11, Safari 5.

Many of the key enhancements include:
- rendering and standards compliance
- security and privacy, including 'do not track' provisions
- javascript and graphics performance acceleration
- 'enhanced' user interfaces

Which one will you upgrade to?

Mar 9, 2011

Why you need to Test it like a hacker!

Some tests you don't want to be too hard. Like those we take in school that we don't think will mean too much to us in life later on. Say, for some it's abstract poetry of the middle ages, basket weaving in the precambrian era, etc. For these you just want to get by, so when an easy test comes along, the tested party generally breathes a sigh of relief.

In contrast, some tests are hard for our own good. Physical endurance tests before summiting Mt. Whitney or K2. Crash tests of car safety equipment like seat belts, air bags and brakes. You really want to make sure those things work as advertised so they'll function when you need them.

So it is with enterprise security testing, and security product testing in particular. In a world where virtually every antivirus (antimalware) or endpoint security product is 'certified' by two or three different labs, one would think they're all equally good. And especially if they've got a certification from the government, right? Dead wrong. They've all been 'certified' because they've been able to figure out how to pass the test, or because the test is not hard enough, not necessarily survive the crash.

In our experience, there's rarely such a thing as 'too hard' of a test. In order to know how well a product will defend you, you've got to TEST IT LIKE A HACKER. You need to subject the products in your environment to the same stress and attacks that they will face against motivated, persistent adversaries sometimes even using advanced techniques. After all, fixing problems before a breach is always much less expensive than cleaning up the mess afterwards.

As more and more high-profile breaches are disclosed, securing our intellectual property and assets is no longer just a technical issue. NSS Labs makes a lot of its security research and educational content available for free. I encourage you to browse some of the results to find out more.

Mar 2, 2011

Redefining the security gateway

This week I'm at the Pacific Crest Emerging Technologies Summit in San Francisco. And security is hot.

Apparently, enterprise IT buyers are not the only ones interested in information security products. Investors - institutional, hedge funds, private equity, etc - are all trying to read the tea leaves of the marketing soup being slung by security vendors. It's a stark contrast to the crowds at BlackHat and Defcon. These investors want to understand which companies will outperform or under-perform their competitors in the marketplace. While they clearly posses great knowledge about the financials of these companies, several are admittedly struggling to understand the technology table-stakes and differentiators required to compete. Increasingly, they're realizing they need to understand the security tech a little better in order to formulate and justify their investment thesis. I'm fielding questions like: Why do we need new security gateways? What is application control about? How are enterprises buying/using the technology? Can opensource security compete? Which approach will win? Which companies have products vs. platforms? With 20 to 40 competing companies in security market segments, surely not all of them can 'perform' and survive long term as stand-alone entities.

In a few hours I'll be tackling some of these questions on a panel with some of the leaders in network security - Barracuda, Fortinet and Sourcefire. This should be a good debate, and we'll have to follow up with some of those larger players who aren't represented, like Check Point, Cisco, HP/TippingPoint, IBM/ISS, Juniper.

RSA update

Like most, I'm recovering from the annual pilgrimage to the RSA conference in San Francisco two weeks ago. As usual, it was a great mecca in which to reconnect with friends, clients, business partners and new folks in the community. I'd especially like to thank all the supporters in our enterprise and vendor advisory boards. The NSS team is grateful for getting 60 of the busiest people in the biz to actively participate in discussions about how to improve information security through testing. It’s a topic that’s garnering momentum. I thank all of you for your input and suggestions on how we can improve and continue to deliver meaningful, actionable information services.

What are your priorities and concerns for 2011? Let us know and you could win a $100 AMEX card. Respondents will receive complementary access to the research results. Take the survey.

New Research
  • We have a number of endpoint protection platform (EPP) and network security reports we are rolling out, including EPP evasion, multi-vector attack protection, next generation firewall (NGFW), and firewall (FW). There will be a subsequent post on each of these.
  • We have been busy coordinating remediation of an important security issue with a number of firewall vendors. Stay tuned for the full report.
  • As Anti-malware continues to fail to protect endpoints, we have been investigating alternatives such as application control (application whitelisting), and secure browsing. While much of this has been performed for private clients in the financial services industry, we are gearing up for a proper group test of these technologies in Q2. Vendors, submit your products. Enterprise buyers, let us know what challenges you’re facing, your criteria and experiences. Contact us

Also New from NSS Labs
  • We rolled out a new video explaining the use cases for our services and how we can help organizations make informed infosec decisions.
  • We also have new collateral which goes into greater detail. See the services overview, or dive into our
  • Finally, NSS is actively expanding to meet the demands of our growing Fortune 2000 client base. If you’re a talented, hands-on infosec professional who understands the value of testing and ethical hacking, and is passionate about improving information security, we should talk. Contact us about career opportunities.

Mar 1, 2011

test

Google Blogger seems to be having issues, along with some other Google Apps, like mail. Check the dashboard.